Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Resilient Economies and Inclusive Digital Growth in a Post-Transformation Era
Articles

The Implementation of Risk Management Policy in Enhancing the Effectiveness of Government Governance: A Study at the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency

Nurul Latifa Dewaty
Universitas Terbuka
Bio
Eka Wirajuang Daurrohmah
Universitas Terbuka
Bio

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • Risk management,
  • Internal Control,
  • Public governance

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of risk management policies in improving public governance effectiveness at the Ministry of ATR/BPN. A descriptive qualitative approach was used through in-depth interviews and document analysis involving regulations, internal guidelines, and the 2025 SPIP maturity assessment. The findings indicate that risk management has been carried out through the stages of identification, analysis, mitigation, and monitoring, although its effectiveness varies across units. Four main factors influence implementation outcomes: leadership commitment, human resource capacity, information system support, and organizational culture. Leadership commitment emerges as the most decisive factor because it shapes policy direction, execution consistency, and oversight quality. Risk management also contributes to strengthening internal control, as reflected in the ministry’s achievement of the “managed and measurable” SPIP maturity level. Overall, the study highlights risk management as an essential foundation for developing adaptive and accountable public governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. ATR/BPN. (2025). Self-assessment report on the maturity of the Government Internal Control System (SPIP). Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency.
  2. BPKP. (2024). Integrated Government Internal Control System (SPIP) maturity report. Financial and Development Supervisory Agency of Indonesia.
  3. COSO. (2004). Enterprise risk management—Integrated framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
  4. Darmawi, H. (2016). Manajemen risiko. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  5. Fraser, J. R. S., & Simkins, B. J. (2016). The challenges of and solutions for implementing enterprise risk management. Business Horizons, 59(6), 689–698.
  6. ISO. (2018). ISO 31000: Risk management—Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization.
  7. KemenPANRB. (2024). National bureaucratic reform evaluation report. Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform of the Republic of Indonesia.
  8. Tjahjadi, B. (2011). Manajemen risiko. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  9. UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme.