Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Advancing Digital Business and Entrepreneurship for a Sustainable Future
Articles

The Influence Of Village Fund Allocation Management on Community Welfare in Jati Village, Trenggalek in 2023

pdf
  • Khamim Reza Ajizi,
  • Wahyu Andrianto,
  • Lusmino Basia
Khamim Reza Ajizi
Universitas Mahakarya Asia, Yogyakarta
Wahyu Andrianto
Universitas Mahakarya Asia, Yogyakarta
Lusmino Basia
Universitas Mahakarya Asia, Yogyakarta

Published 2025-04-30

Keywords

  • Accountability,
  • Transparency,
  • Community Participation,
  • Community Welfare,
  • Public Sector Accounting

Copyright (c) 2025 Khamim Reza Ajizi, Wahyu Andrianto, Lusmino Basia (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Financial management at the village level has a very important role in realising sustainable development to improve the welfare of rural communities. Good and efficient management of village fund allocations is a must to ensure the achievement of optimal development goals. This study aims to determine the effect of accountability, transparency, and community participation in the management of village fund allocations on community welfare in Jati Village, Karangan Subdistrict, Trenggalek Regency in 2023.This study uses quantitative methods where data collection is done by distributing questionnaires. The data analysis tools used in this study include descriptive analysis, validity test, reliability test, classical assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis. Hypothesis testing using the t test and F test. The results of this study indicate that the variables of accountability, transparency, and community participation in the management of village fund allocations partially and simultaneously have a significant effect on community welfare in Jati Village, Karangan District, Trenggalek Regency in 2023.

pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
  2. Gunarathne, N., & Lee, K. H. (2021). Corporate cleaner production strategy development and environmental management accounting: A contingency theory perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 308(December 2020), 127402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127402
  3. Ismail, M., Alias, S. N., & Rasdi, R. M. (2015). Community as stakeholder of the corporate social responsibility programme in Malaysia: Outcomes in community development. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2013-0053
  4. Jaya, I. M. L. M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif: Teori, Penerapan, danRiset Nyata. Anak Hebat Indonesia.
  5. Marrone, M., Linnenluecke, M. K., Richardson, G., & Smith, T. (2020). Trends in environmental accounting research within and outside of the accounting discipline. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(8), 2167–2193. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2020-4457
  6. Mertha Jaya, I. M. L. (STIE B. Y. (2019). Perlakuan Akuntansi Sektor Publik Desa. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.32662/gaj.v2i1.464
  7. Prayogo, Y., Fikri, A. S., & Nandini, K. P. (2023). Analisis Implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2010 Tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintah (SAP) Berbasis Akrual dalam Penyusunan Laporan Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Jurnal Manajemen Sosial Ekonomi, 3(2), 44–58. http://journal.stiestekom.ac.id/index.php/dinamikapage44
  8. Rudy, Sunardi, N., & Kartono. (2020). Pengetahuan Keuangan dan Love Of Money pengaruhnya terhadap Pengelolaan Keuangan Pribadi dan dampaknya terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Desa Cihambulu, Kec. Pabuaran Kab. Subang. Jurnal SEKURITAS(Saham, Ekonomi, Keuangan Dan Investasi ), 4(1), 43–56.
  9. Soewarno, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Mediating effect of strategy on competitive pressure, stakeholder pressure and strategic performance management (SPM): evidence from HEIs in Indonesia. Benchmarking, 27(6), 1743–1764. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2019-0292
  10. Stein, M. J., Salterio, S. E., & Shearer, T. (2017). ‘“Transparency”’ in Accounting and Corporate Governance: Making Sense of Multiple Meanings. ACCOUNTING AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 17(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.2308/apin-51746
  11. Sujarweni, V. W., & Jaya, I. M. L. M. (2019a). Faktor yang Menentukan (Determinan) Akuntabilitas Keuangan Dana Desa Pasca Penarapan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 tahun 2014. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(3), 201–218.
  12. Sujarweni, V. W., & Jaya, I. M. L. M. (2019b). Community Empowerment in the Development of Geoheritage Tourism Cliff Breksi for Improved Livelihood Villagers Sambirejo Yogyakarta [Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Pengembangan Wisata Warisan Geoheritage Tebing Breksi untuk Peningkatan Taraf Hidup Warga De. Proceeding of Community Development, 2, 915. https://doi.org/10.30874/comdev.2018.389
  13. Sujarweni, V. W., Jaya, I. M. L. M., & Utami, L. R. (2024). HOUSEHOLD ACCOUNTING : TATA KELOLA KEUANGAN RUMAH TANGGA SEJAHTERA DAN MANDIRI DI YOGYAKARTA. Jurnal PKM: Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 07(05), 553–560.
  14. Wong, C. W. Y., Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., & Tang, A. K. Y. (2021). Strategies for building environmental transparency and accountability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169116
  15. Zhao, W., Luo, Z. S., & Liu, Q. (2023). Does supply chain matter for environmental firm performance: mediating role of financial development in China. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(6), 3811–3837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09410-7